The Human Development Index
89
The HDI
The Human Development Index ranks the countries of the world in terms of its human development. The Human Development Index implies whether a country is developed, developing or underdeveloped. The Human Development Index sets a standard means of measuring human development and sets levels of options of person for personal achievement. The Human Development Index is published by the United Nations Development Programme and is the centerpiece of the UN’s Human Development Report. The Human Development Index was created as an alternative to the common practice to rank human development solely on a country’s gross domestic product.
First published in 1990 under Pakistani economist Mahbub ul Haq and Indian Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen, the goal of the Human Development Report and the Human Development Index was to accurately measure whether people are better off in terms of health, freedom, education and other aspects of life not measured by gross GDP. The originators stated: “People are the real wealth of a nation. The basic objective of development is to create an enabling environment for people to enjoy long, healthy and creative lives. This may appear to be a simple truth. But it is often forgotten in the immediate concern with the accumulation of commodities and financial wealth.”
The Formula
In order to rank whether a certain country is developed, developing, or underdeveloped, the Human Development Index looks at a number of different factors. The Index measures life expetency, literacy, education, and GDP for countriers worldwide. These variables are then put into a mathematical algoryth which measures the potentioal and real developmenet of any given nation.
The 2008 Report.
The last time the report of the Human Development Index were released in 2009, Iceland, Norway and Canada were considered the three most developed countries in the world. The United States was seen to be the 15th most developed nation, falling three places since the last time the study was conducted. Sierra Lione was considered the least developed nation of the 178 studied. Many nations do not cooperate with the study and are therefore not listed.
Criticisms
The Human Development Index is highly criticized. Many criticize the failure of the index to include any ecological considerations and have lost touch with its original purpose. It is highly criticized for being redundant and adding very little to the development of countries.
Other criticisms include that the Human Development Index does not look at enough factors to truly gage the level of happiness an individual feels in a certain country. Critics claim to measure true happiness the formula must include physical, biological, mental, emotional, social, educational, economic, and cultural components. However, the Human Development Index only looks at life expectancy, adult literacy and education. It leaves our much of the cultural components that make up a society.
Related Articles
- Model United Nations Information
What is a Model United Nations? A Model United Nations is a simulation of a real conference in the United Nations. Some of the committees that are often included are: General Assembly, Security Council,... - Has the United Nations Outlived its Usefulness?
United Nations Headquarters in New York General overview of the United Nations The United Nations was created in 1946 at the end of WWII with headquarters in New York. It was created to replace the... - World Refugee Day
One of the main purposes of the United Nations is to encourage solidarity between the different countries of the world and to bring these nations together to defend against common threats to mankind. To...
CommentsLoading...
i wonder if they consider factors like how much crap you buy from IKEA or how many ethanol cars you have or maybe it's how socialist your country is after all it is socialists making the list...its like a vegan food critic from san francisco eating in houston....one contradiction eating another. your rating probably goes down corresponding to the larger amount of military and world conflict you are involved in. Surprised switzerland isn't at the top!
Interesting article, bg. I appreciate the explanation of the index. Care to hazard a guess why those dark green areas are dark green?
If the human race is a race, those in the dark green are the winners?
Makes one wonder if the ones not participating are ashamed of their countries? :) great info.
It is a rather accurate measurement which takes into account multiple factors and is on the whole unbiased and quite transparent..
Really interesting! I took a Human Geography class and learned all about this (the most interesting class I've ever taken, I must say). And I believe, myself being a Canadian (which represents my political and social views on a general scale), that it is fairly accurate on the whole. And I think it goes to show America's healthcare system needs a little tweaking, I'd say.
Whether one agrees with the accuracy of the HDI, it's still great info to have. Thanks!
erm, i came to this website hopig to find some decnet information about canada on the human development index, i didnt fin it, so therefore in my opinion your website wasnt usefull to me in any way possible!
GOOD INFO

















Satyam7 2 years ago
Very interesting article. It takes more than life expectancy to judge Human Development for a country.
Thank you.